|
Post by rabidbite on Aug 13, 2014 15:28:52 GMT -5
rabidbite, I'm saying the extra money they'll get from saying "hey look, we made mediaviewer, now give us money" rather than just "give us money" is less than the money they spent on developing MediaViewer. By far. Aja. Got it! How is that trend determined? rabid
|
|
|
Post by lixxx235 on Aug 14, 2014 0:01:35 GMT -5
rabidbite by the transparency report showing his department guzzling up more than 3 million dollars- and donations haven't gone up at all.
|
|
|
Post by rabidbite on Aug 14, 2014 9:10:24 GMT -5
rabidbite by the transparency report showing his department guzzling up more than 3 million dollars- and donations haven't gone up at all. Now that is nasty. Has the man given a statement as to his reasons? Something constructive or credible? rabid
|
|
|
Post by lixxx235 on Aug 14, 2014 9:45:36 GMT -5
rabidbite: His reason is that the readers did not contribute to the discussion on whether to turn off mediaviewer or not. (Although he did have a poll and a supermajority of readers polled found it not useful) His other "rationale" is that the community cannot have a consensus to turn off a "core feature". (why is mediaviewer a "core feature"?)
|
|
|
Post by rabidbite on Aug 14, 2014 14:06:22 GMT -5
This is so going to end in a fraud investigation.
rabid
|
|
|
Post by lixxx235 on Aug 18, 2014 15:38:48 GMT -5
|
|