|
|
Post by grävling on Nov 6, 2014 21:59:34 GMT -5
 What is the difference between 'escorting an ally' and 'escorting a target'?? |
|
|
|
Post by ntsheep on Nov 6, 2014 22:01:05 GMT -5
You may want to change the title of this thread grävling. Some of us may take it the wrong way  |
|
|
|
Post by grävling on Nov 6, 2014 22:02:03 GMT -5
Given that I just finished lamb dinner, indeed.  |
|
|
|
Post by fallen on Nov 6, 2014 22:20:31 GMT -5
grävling - escorting an ally indicate escorting someone into friendly territory. Escorting a target indicates escorting someone into hostile territory. The price difference is notable.
|
|
|
|
Post by grävling on Nov 6, 2014 22:57:17 GMT -5
Then you have a bug, because the last 2 jobs are both to West End, and one gets marked 'ally' and one gets marked 'target'.
|
|
|
|
Post by fallen on Nov 6, 2014 23:01:38 GMT -5
grävling - Based on the Connector type, Connector Faction, your Rep, Rumors and Conflicts, some jobs are served out as "friendly escorts" meaning there is no direct expected risk to the target, and the others as "dangerous escorts." The price difference is significant. The target region for the job is often related, but not forcibly related. I don't see anything that looks like a bug in your screenshot.
|
|
|
|
Post by grävling on Nov 6, 2014 23:08:23 GMT -5
Okay, I misunderstood the implications of what you said. Sorry about that.
|
|
|
|
Post by fallen on Nov 6, 2014 23:52:47 GMT -5
No problem at all. You're less likely to get stopped in the street by an anti-job Encounter, but you're paid significantly less (50% base price before all the modifiers are applied). As your Rep goes up, you get a better chance of getting the more lucrative kind. I love the new jobs system  |
|
|
|
Post by ntsheep on Nov 7, 2014 0:02:36 GMT -5
I bet when fallen starts thinking about the new job system, he goes around saying,  or something like that |
|
