|
|
Post by streamlock on Dec 8, 2019 2:37:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by fallen on Dec 8, 2019 12:22:23 GMT -5
Depends immensely who you are selling it to.
What faction is the contact? What Traits does she have that you know of?
|
|
|
|
Post by streamlock on Dec 8, 2019 14:27:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Dec 8, 2019 15:00:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Cory Trese on Dec 13, 2019 6:50:53 GMT -5
I am trying to figure this one out.
|
|
|
|
Post by spacez52 on Dec 18, 2019 22:37:49 GMT -5
I have a similar one that might help or might not be a bug.
Selling Steel Song Intel (no related conflict) to a Mok Politician Contact while Steel Song and Mok are in an Alliance gives Steel Song +1 Conflict score and not Mok. Shouldn't it be Mok that gets the +1?
The Mok Politician has Entertainer Addict, Tinkerer, and 2 unknown traits.
|
|
|
|
Post by spacez52 on Jan 13, 2020 10:45:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by fallen on Jan 13, 2020 15:13:30 GMT -5
Thanks for the additional details. This bug is still on the long list. We will post here if we pick it up and make any progress.
|
|
|
|
Post by gilmoy on Feb 1, 2020 22:08:28 GMT -5
Based on my data, const intel always does this. ("const" = Conflict-free, so its value is const over time  ) You can get const intel from any card game (these say "movements"), ship boarding/victory talents, and Interrogation Ward. Selling const intel about faction F to a contact of faction C gives +1 Conflict Score to all conflicts between F and C, in F's favor. The benefit goes to the intel's faction, not the contact's faction, so the brand name on the intel wrapper matters. Yes, you can "hurt" your own faction C this way. Selling const intel about faction G back to its own faction G gives +1 Conflict Score to every conflict involving G. If G is involved in 4 Conflicts, G gets +1 to each one. Zealot's Warhawk applies to each of these, so four +1s can become four +3s and +48 XP in one sale. I never thought of it as a bug. It's consistent, so you can plan ahead to exploit it. The pre-sale blurb might be inaccurate, but that could be a text bug. |
|
[/img]
)