|
|
Post by Crimson on May 7, 2014 15:17:17 GMT -5
Mine1 in theory is no better than mine 2. As the maintenance cost is simply doubled. In game there seems to be a slight efficency.
Need better descriptions on all of the techs. And the bonuses and minuses.
Probably the same on the trade treaties etc.
Crimson
|
|
|
|
Post by khearn on May 7, 2014 15:21:17 GMT -5
I asked a similar question about Hab Units. Remember that you can only build a number of buildings up to the quality level of the planet without paying a penalty. So a Mine II may not look any better than 2x Mine I, it takes up less "quality space".
|
|
|
|
Post by ChocoCrowbar on May 7, 2014 16:00:15 GMT -5
I'd like to know what that penalty is. Is it a % on the upkeep of a building?
|
|
|
|
Post by fallen on May 7, 2014 16:38:25 GMT -5
Yes, the % is applied to the total maintenance cost for the planet, increasing it.
|
|
|
|
Post by ChocoCrowbar on May 7, 2014 19:24:08 GMT -5
Yes, the % is applied to the total maintenance cost for the planet, increasing it. Mmm ok ok, so going over a tiny bit wont affect much, even if its with mines that have a low upkeep. |
|
|
|
Post by fallen on May 7, 2014 19:47:58 GMT -5
@chococrowbar - it is very dependent on the planet's income to maintenance ratio. Mining worlds are not bad to "overclock"
|
|
|
|
Post by Officer Genious on May 7, 2014 19:58:38 GMT -5
@chococrowbar - it is very dependent on the planet's income to maintenance ratio. Mining worlds are not bad to "overclock" But for worlds relying on spice trades it would be a terrible idea, right? |
|
|
|
Post by fallen on May 7, 2014 20:49:13 GMT -5
|
|
